It is practically a given in technology that for every new trend, application and problem solved, somebody somewhere will coin a name to label the solution and market beyond its original boundaries. But this is more than just a matter of semantics when it comes to Field Service Management and it’s younger but far bigger cousin Enterprise Mobility Management. Motion Computing’s Head of UK, Ian Davies explains why…
The naming of new industries and their obligatory acronyms is in itself is no bad thing as it leads to the creation and refinement of entire markets. Once upon a time, someone at Gartner coined the phrase ERP, and that is now a billion dollar industry in its own right. Likewise the same for CRM. And even document management.
But within field service, this rush to label activity has led to some confusion. As mobile computing solutions have become ubiquitous, present throughout an organisation, from the boardroom to the delivery van and beyond, field service has been swallowed up by the name of enterprise mobility. Whilst it would be easy to fall prey to hyperbole, this is a dangerous development.
Field service – more specifically, field service management (FSM) – refers to a system that is often hosted or cloud-based and combines hardware and software – typically internet services – to support companies in locating vehicles, manage worker activity, schedule and dispatch work, ensure driver safety, and ideally integrate with inventory, billing, accounting and other back-office systems.
FSM usually refers to companies who need to manage the installation, service or repair of systems or equipment. Typically this means utilities, telecommunications, construction and logistics organisations, though this is by no means an exhaustive list.
FSM is already a pretty mature market. Gartner research puts the revenue for packaged field service dispatch and workforce management software applications, not including service revenue, at approximately $1.2 billion in 2012, with a compound annual growth rate of 12.7% and Gartner estimates that market penetration for field service applications has reached just 25% of the addressable market.
Gartner research puts the revenue for packaged field service dispatch and workforce management software applications, not including service revenue, at approximately $1.2 billion in 2012
Figures on the entire EMM market vary wildly but the incredible growth of tablet manufacturers, mobile application developers and network providers point to a market undergoing explosive growth. Aberdeen Group highlights that over 1 billion smartphones and 200 million tablets have shipped globally since 2007.
Which fish eats which?
So, the question now becomes one of hierarchy – does FSM live within EMM or the other way around? Whilst field service management has a greater legacy than enterprise mobility, it is clear that the reach of enterprise mobility will soon far outstrip FSM. And therein perhaps lies the answer: FSM is essentially a collection of business critical processes that relies upon enterprise mobility in order to get the job done.
Why is this important? If FSM is just an example of EMM at work, why does it need to be so carefully labelled and kept separate? Simply put, because the very value of EMM is dependent on the specific business context of the mobile deployment.
For example, it is pointless giving consumer grade tablet PCs, without the right accessories and running cheap, yet unproven software to a legion of field engineers and expect anything other than chaos to result. The tablets will not be rugged enough and they will break. The lack of correct accessories will hamper productivity and work flow. The software will not interface with back office systems and jobs will be lost. This is nothing against the tablet or the software itself – just that it is not fit for purpose in the FSM context.
Of course, elsewhere that same tablet and cheap app may be ideal – for example in a controlled office environment. The point is that the very value of FSM is that it is a specific example of enterprise mobility, but that the generic nature of EMM will not sit well in the FSM context.
So what does this mean for those field service managers looking to explore mobile technologies? Firstly it means that they must recognise that they hold the key to a valuable deployment of mobile technology that will bring real ROI. Traditionally these decisions have lain with IT or perhaps finance – but for EMM to work for a field service organisation, it must be operationally driven.
And secondly it means that field service managers must become well versed in the options available to them. If the Gartner figures are correct, then the remaining 75% of the field service management market will – over the next three to five years – be intensely active with many enterprise mobility technologies moving into the industry. Separating those technologies that truly are field service specific – and not just named as such – will be vital.